From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun  7 03:52:56 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C7DF016A4CE; Mon,  7 Jun 2004 03:52:56 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 34C0443D1F; Sun,  6 Jun 2004 20:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i573qrtD010682;
	Sun, 6 Jun 2004 23:52:55 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 23:52:53 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com
To: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com>
In-Reply-To: <1086569050.66929.2.camel@server.mcneil.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10406062350580.9937-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: more symbol binding problems
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 03:52:57 -0000

On Sun, 6 Jun 2004, Sean McNeil wrote:

> On Sun, 2004-06-06 at 17:25, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > On Sun, 6 Jun 2004, Sean McNeil wrote:
> > 
> > > I do not understand why it is calling select in lib.so.5.  Shouldn't it
> > > have called the one in libc_r?  With GLOBAL or LOCAL DAG this should
> > > have been resolved via the weak symbol to __select, no?
> > 
> > Yes, it shouldn't be using select() from libc; select() should be
> > resolved to _select() in libc_r (which calls __sys_poll() in libc).
> > 
> > > The interesting thing here is that if I use libpthread for apache then
> > > there are no problems.  Maybe not all that suprising, though, as there
> > > is no real difference in the select with libpthread whereas libc_r has a
> > > much more complex implementation.
> > 
> > Sounds like the linker isn't doing the right thing.
> 
> Would you think it is the linker, or rtld?  Any ideas where I should
> start?  I was going to look through rtld but I will focus on ld if you
> think that is where the problem is.

I meant the run-time linker (rtld).

-- 
Dan Eischen