From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 12 11:22:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F7016A416; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 11:22:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lothrandil@n00b.apagnu.se) Received: from pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 861C043D8C; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 11:22:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lothrandil@n00b.apagnu.se) Received: from [90.224.57.146] (90.224.57.146) by pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.2.075) id 452BAB4100664E7B; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:22:52 +0100 Message-ID: <4557040D.2090608@n00b.apagnu.se> Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:22:53 +0100 From: Niclas Zeising User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc Fonvieille References: <200611120013.kAC0D5GM097268@repoman.freebsd.org> <200611121144.28895.jkois@freebsd.org> <4556FE2A.1080501@n00b.apagnu.se> <20061112111431.GA84563@abigail.blackend.org> In-Reply-To: <20061112111431.GA84563@abigail.blackend.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Johann Kois , doc-committers@freebsd.org, Giorgos Keramidas , cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/security chapter.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 11:22:56 -0000 Marc Fonvieille wrote: > On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 11:57:46AM +0100, Niclas Zeising wrote: >> The difference between ssh and ssh is that >> ssh can be both an application and a protocol, and we have to >> differentiate that. Apart from that, I find staring a sentence with a >> non-capitalized letter looks weird. Maybe we should use the >> all-capitalized version, at least when talking about the protocol. > > SSH is the protocol, and ssh is the application/program (so > or according to the > situation). We also have to start a sentence with a capitalized letter, > so we used to do the same thing as in the manual page, i.e, writing "The > blahblah utility/tool/program/whatever". > Okay. I'll do an overhaul of the security chapter and see if I can make some sort of progress regarding consistency between, SSH, ssh and so on, using SSH for the protocol, and ssh or ssh depending on the situation. Thanks for the clarification! Regards! //Niclas