Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:04:38 +0100 From: RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: most "universal" file system for 1TB external USB2 hard drive Message-ID: <20080829220438.3d47165f@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <d356c5630808291321s336e492cj165e9a2ff993cff4@mail.gmail.com> References: <d356c5630808221113x7e931338k532c9a8f1f126aac@mail.gmail.com> <20080823011722.1315394f@gumby.homeunix.com.> <d356c5630808291321s336e492cj165e9a2ff993cff4@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:21:40 -0500 "Andrew Gould" <andrewlylegould@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 7:17 PM, RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> > wrote: > > > > > There is also NTFS through ntfs-3g ,which is available for all of > > the above (sysutils/fusefs-ntfs on FreeBSD). Having a native Windows > > filesystem is sensible on a portable drive, and fat32 is not a great > > filesystem. > > > > http://www.ntfs-3g.org > > _______________________________________________ > > <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> > > > Great suggestion! > > I have NTFS support compiled into the kernel. Do you know if this > conflicts with the usage of ntfs-3g? I wouldn't have thought so, it uses the fuse kernel module, the rest is in userland.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080829220438.3d47165f>