From owner-freebsd-advocacy Thu Jul 30 08:07:47 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA13844 for freebsd-advocacy-outgoing; Thu, 30 Jul 1998 08:07:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA13823 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 1998 08:07:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA18930; Thu, 30 Jul 1998 08:06:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: "Eric S. Raymond" cc: Don Wilde , freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: branding In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 30 Jul 1998 11:07:15 EDT." <19980730110715.A16515@snark.thyrsus.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 08:06:04 -0700 Message-ID: <18919.901811164@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > And if you look at the `cases' page, you'll see that both Whistle and > Walnut Creek are in fact listed there. When I hear from Oracle/NCI, > I'll add them too. > > It's always wise to get your facts straight before flaming. Um, Eric, you're the one who made the "argument" that groups wouldn't be worthy of your consideration unless they had $1M/yr run-rates and I was simply citing the above as examples of folks who DO have >$1M/yr run rates with FreeBSD based products. Since you've now stated that these folks are already listed, I have to wonder at the logic of your earlier arguments at all. It's always wise to remain self-consistent in your arguments also. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message