From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 9 12:08:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E9116A4CE for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2005 12:08:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B344343D46 for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2005 12:08:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nohuman@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so663656wri for ; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 04:08:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fFWm3LJ6vpJZuF/mX8dPLK8sR7mBEFRhALvqBL7s5Y7l0t74Ky+Ekto9oNU8pwTnhSR7tGj2dtUTPY8Zb+IfFQ0DtYV3axW4zlo2A+NVDqD1cxAvRFXsr6BdB/FRiTqiXQX9U3wi5ZlYE3y01MRNdVtt5Mfug1Uum1l6LbsbsvA= Received: by 10.54.52.11 with SMTP id z11mr315420wrz; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 04:08:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.31.60 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Jan 2005 04:08:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5e51d2fd050109040866950144@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 13:08:22 +0100 From: Thomas Beer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: asynchronous packet loss X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Thomas Beer List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 12:08:24 -0000 Hi, I'm dealing with this issue since six weeks or so with no avail or a clear source of failure. So this may be my last chance. I have a 5.2.1 R Wifi access point on a Netgear MA 311 and two clients. I tested this with different versions of firmware. One client, a 5.3 B-7 has no problems in both directions for TCP/IP traffic.The second is a XP-SP2 laptop. If I ping from the XP to the 5.2.1 R i get 0% Packet loss. The other way around will have a packet loss of appr. 70% at the same time. Further more drops the packet loss to appr. 10-20% if there is huge traffic on the segment (i.e. copying some MB etc.). Any help is highly appreciated Tom