From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Jan  8 07:02:59 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id HAA08668
          for ports-outgoing; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 07:02:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ingenieria ([168.176.15.11])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id HAA08654
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 07:02:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ingenieria (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id JAA01944; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 09:45:57 -0500
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 09:45:57 -0500 (EST)
From: Pedro Giffuni <m230761@ingenieria.ingsala.unal.edu.co>
To: Satoshi Asami <asami@cs.berkeley.edu>
cc: ache@nagual.ru, imp@village.org, ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Niklas Hallqvist: archivers/hpack.non-usa.only
In-Reply-To: <199701080747.XAA11117@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.970108093549.1846B-100000@ingenieria.ingsala.unal.edu.co>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



On Tue, 7 Jan 1997, Satoshi Asami wrote:

>  * I disagree with this (proposed) way of patching: as clearly stated on "the 
>  * porting guidelines", there is a common way to identify BSD4.4, if there are 
>  * bla, bla bla...(I wrote it..)
> 
> I agree with this in principle.  If it can be differentiated by the
> BSD macro, it should be used instead of __FreeBSD__ and/or
> __OpenBSD__.
> 
I was thinking on replacing (on all our port tree) 
#ifdef __FreeBSD__
for:
#if (defined(BSD) && (BSD >= 199306)) /*BSD 4.4*/

And let the OpenBSD guys report their specific patches. I asume they will 
want to mirror our master site and they will have a ports master(?).

Pedro.

> 
> Well, I'm going to quit here.  But boy, this code is ugly.
> 
> Satoshi
>