From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 16:22:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66FB637B401 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 16:22:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A552243F75 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 16:22:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com[24.147.188.198]) by attbi.com (rwcrmhc51) with ESMTP id <200305082322210510081tpde>; Thu, 8 May 2003 23:22:21 +0000 Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.188.198] (may be forged)) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h48NMJkm082907; Thu, 8 May 2003 19:22:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: (from lowell@localhost) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id h48NMJro082904; Thu, 8 May 2003 19:22:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: be-well.ilk.org: lowell set sender to freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org using -f Sender: lowell@be-well.no-ip.com To: "meimi" References: <20030506090721.Q62023-100000@foem> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 08 May 2003 19:22:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <447k91rplg.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 6 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Newbies Question: High inactive memory and Quota in kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 23:22:22 -0000 "meimi" writes: > 1.Why the inactive memory be so high? Is it a rpoblem? Why *would* it be a problem? At least it's holding data that *might* be useful.