From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 2 21:58:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BE3106566C; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 21:58:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ray@ddteam.net) Received: from mail-fx0-f223.google.com (mail-fx0-f223.google.com [209.85.220.223]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B368FC08; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 21:58:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm23 with SMTP id 23so200279fxm.3 for ; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:58:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.7.69 with SMTP id c5mr7380197fac.14.1267565769987; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:36:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (131-84-133-95.pool.ukrtel.net [95.133.84.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm7942573fks.53.2010.03.02.13.36.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:36:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 23:35:29 +0200 From: Alex RAY To: Dimitry Andric Message-Id: <20100302233529.77625a5a.ray@ddteam.net> In-Reply-To: <4B8D67C4.9050709@andric.com> References: <20100219163644.da89e882.ray@dlink.ua> <20100302071736.GF1946@garage.freebsd.pl> <20100302104748.0f27136c.ray@dlink.ua> <4B8D67C4.9050709@andric.com> Organization: DDTeam.net X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexandr Rybalko , geom@freebsd.org, embedded@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GEOM_ULZMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:58:26 -0000 On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:32:20 +0100 Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2010-03-02 09:47, Alexandr Rybalko wrote: > >>> Definiatelly separately, not sure where. There is ongoing discussion > >>> somwhere on importing this algorithm to the base for tar(1) to use, it > >>> would be best to have only one copy of code in the tree. > > I have already said, that it would be good for embedded platforms have only one copy of the code for the kernel and userland. > > It is not thought of how done it. > > I think Pawel means the *source* code in this case, not the executable > code. E.g. lzma source should most likely go under /usr/src/contrib, > and be built separately for kernel and userland. I understand. I'm trying to think about the future of FreeBSD in embedded. :) -- Alexandr Rybalko aka Alex RAY