From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 22 02:27:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A4F16A4CE; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 02:27:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp2.jazztel.es (smtp2.jazztel.es [62.14.3.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA9743D54; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 02:27:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from antivirus by smtp2.jazztel.es with antivirus id 1CW3vN-0001Da-00 Mon, 22 Nov 2004 03:27:29 +0100 Received: from [212.106.237.232] (helo=rguez.homeunix.net) by smtp2.jazztel.es with esmtp id 1CW3vM-0001DB-00 Mon, 22 Nov 2004 03:27:28 +0100 Received: from redesjm.local (orion.redesjm.local [192.168.254.16]) by rguez.homeunix.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iAM2RUGO090838; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 03:27:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@redesjm.local) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by redesjm.local (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iAM2RVSP001308; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 03:27:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@redesjm.local) From: Jose M Rodriguez To: obrien@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 03:27:30 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <41A01DF9.9090607@sc.rr.com> <20041121205219.GA1154@dragon.nuxi.com> <20041122020040.GA12663@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20041122020040.GA12663@dragon.nuxi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200411220327.31085.freebsd@redesjm.local> X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1; AVE: 6.28.0.12; VDF: 6.28.0.76; host: antares.redesjm.local) X-Virus-Scanned: by antivirus cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: vim-lite-6.3.16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 02:27:33 -0000 El Lunes, 22 de Noviembre de 2004 03:00, David O'Brien escribi=F3: > On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 12:52:19PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 07:41:14PM +0100, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > > > El Domingo, 21 de Noviembre de 2004 18:27, David O'Brien > > > escribi?: > > > > > > cp> On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 06:06:27AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > > > > William Allison p??e v so 20. 11. 2004 v 23:47 -0500: > > > > > > I'm sorry but I can't seem to figure this out and haven't > > > > > > been able to get help on IRC. > > > > > > > > > > [ ... ] > > > > > > > > I would more than welcome a patch for a tested vim-gtk (or > > > > vim-gtk2) slave port[*] that I could review and test. > > > > > > I use this locally for weeks > > > > This isn't a slave port. See vim-lite for an example of what I > > mean. Also your patch un-portlint's the Makefile more than it > > already is. > > Why isn't the following suffient for a GTK slave port? I just prefer fix what I really want. WITH_GTK2=3Dyes WITH_I18N=3Dyes # localized menus and messages WITH_CSCOPE=3Dyes # cscope support WITH_PERL=3Dyes # perl integration So this can be build as package even with only BATCH=3Dyes. =2D- josemi