From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 16:23:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A228237B401; Sat, 2 Aug 2003 16:23:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from artificial.ath.cx (12-225-126-254.client.attbi.com [12.225.126.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD3A43FA3; Sat, 2 Aug 2003 16:23:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Peorth@artificial.ath.cx) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by artificial.ath.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95BF333C0A2; Sat, 2 Aug 2003 16:23:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Peorth To: Ruslan Ermilov In-Reply-To: <20030802172322.GB36129@sunbay.com> References: <1059796086.35389.255.camel@artificial.ath.cx> <20030802055028.GB55688@sunbay.com> <1059804513.35389.307.camel@artificial.ath.cx> <20030802172322.GB36129@sunbay.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1059866593.84960.11.camel@artificial.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 16:23:13 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: groff and mkdep? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 23:23:01 -0000 I wasn't running make with -e. I believe the commandline was similar to 'make -DNO_KERBEROS -DNO_WERROR buildworld', and never saw miscellaneous switches passed. So, yeah, it worked only after I unset CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS for that session's environment. Like I said, I'm generally new to this. Not so much FreeBSD as why something on that level was breaking. I didn't set -e, and didn't see it miscellaneously set someplace, so could this be a bug that I stumbled across? That was using the 5.1-RELEASE version of make to do that buildworld of CURRENT, so I'll have to check later if it has similar behavior with CURRENT's make. On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 10:23, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:08:33PM -0700, Peorth wrote: > > That seems so weird. > > CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS were set to something in the general environment, > > for non-port builds, but I thought the FreeBSD make system used for > > ports and such wouldn't get polluted by simply having that defined as a > > variable in the env. *headscratch* Maybe just my mistake, but thanks a > > lot. I never would've realized it was CFLAGS! Perhaps make should warn > > if setting CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS are going to pollute, at least on certain > > things like in the /usr/src tree, though up 'till that point, everything > > built fine, too. *shrug* > > > Hmm. From the make(1) manpage: > > : The four different classes of variables (in order of increasing prece- > : dence) are: > : > : Environment variables > : Variables defined as part of make's environment. > : > : Global variables > : Variables defined in the makefile or in included makefiles. > : > : Command line variables > : Variables defined as part of the command line. > : > : Local variables > : Variables that are defined specific to a certain target. The > : seven local variables are as follows: > > Are you telling me that setting CFLAGS in the ENVIRONMENT causes > this strange behavior? (I cannot reproduce it here, because > environment variables are of a lower precedence than globals.) > > Are you sure you weren't running make(1) with the -e option? > (I can reproduce this with this option, as it causes environment > variables to take higher precedence than globals.) > > > Cheers,