From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Apr 10 19:50:38 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA00206
          for ports-outgoing; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 19:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from iworks.InterWorks.org (iworks.interworks.org [128.255.18.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA00200
          for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 19:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iworks.InterWorks.org
	(1.37.109.8/16.2) id AA22156; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 21:10:57 -0500
Message-Id: <9604110210.AA22156@iworks.InterWorks.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 21:10:57 -0500
From: "Daniel M. Eischen" <deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org>
To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu, ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Question about Motif packages
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



>  * SWiM 2.0 makes you set a link from /usr/X386 to /usr/X11R6.  It then uses
>  * /usr/X386 in its Install script.  The static libraries and include files
>  * then get installed in /usr/X386/lib and /usr/X386/include respectively.
>  * This is fine.  But the provided install script also wants to install the
>  * shared libraries in /lib; I changed this to be the same as the static libs
>  * (/usr/X386/lib = /usr/X11R6/lib).  The Install script has a couple of
>  * minor bugs that are easily fixed.
> 
> Ok, so if we use /usr/X11R6, we should be fine, right?  I don't think
> we are going to worry too much about shared libraries being in /lib,
> that's horribly out-of-the-line! ;)

Yup.

> Also, library locations are easily overridable in /etc/make.conf
> anyway, so I'll think we'll stick to standard locations for the default.
> 
>  * Patching the LOCAL_LIBRARIES to "-lXm -lXt -lX11 -lXext" or to
>  * "/usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.a -lXt -lX11 -lXext" for dynamic or static should
>  * work fine.
> 
> Yes.
> 
>  * SWiM 2.0 does leave xmkmf alone and does provide a mxmkmf.  They update
>  * the lib/X11/config/Imake.tmpl and save the original Imake.tmpl in
>  * Imake.tmpl.old
> 
> I see.  Let me know if you find something weird in the way that xmkmf
> behaves.

So far so good.  Xmcd-1.4 and 2.0 both worked fine with xmkmf and setting
the LOCAL_LIBRARIES appropriately.

>  * Do you want the unpatched Install script for SWiM 2.0?
> 
> No, I think your explanation above is quite clear. :)
> 
> Satoshi

Dan Eischen
deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org