From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Sep 2 19:23:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA24443 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 2 Sep 1998 19:23:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from calis.BlackSun.org (slip-ppp-4-198.escape.com [205.160.46.198]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA24424 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 1998 19:23:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from don@calis.BlackSun.org) Received: from localhost (don@localhost) by calis.BlackSun.org (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id WAA10090; Wed, 2 Sep 1998 22:22:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from don@calis.BlackSun.org) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1998 22:22:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Don To: Frank Terhaar-Yonkers cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 8mm tape block size max - changed? In-Reply-To: <199809030119.VAA25476@claret.cisco.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I recently upgraded from 2.0.x where I routinely used a block size of > 128b with tar and dump. Using 2.1.7 Why are there so many older freebsd installations around? Isnt FreeBSD up to version 2.2.7-STABLE? -don To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message