From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Mar 11 21:23:06 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B2EF50822 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 21:23:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [88.98.225.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A78E2803D3 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 21:23:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from crayon2.yoonka.com (crayon2.yoonka.com [10.70.7.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w2BLN4UM054282 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 21:23:04 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Subject: Re: Incorrect route interface Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <9dd657bc-ad58-f5cb-327a-572a561f1d6b@gjunka.com> <5AA45F89.7090800@grosbein.net> <21e1b380-4d4a-cd26-5694-fac51cc0dfa2@gjunka.com> <5AA4C6E3.2050909@grosbein.net> <789ff583-7995-75ce-94c8-9e2fe8b17488@gjunka.com> <20180311205731.GA30079@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> From: Grzegorz Junka Message-ID: <0abdf126-64f6-9e98-f109-b843ba333086@gjunka.com> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 21:23:04 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180311205731.GA30079@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-GB-large X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 21:23:06 -0000 On 11/03/2018 20:57, Marek Zarychta wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 05:46:52PM +0000, Grzegorz Junka wrote: >> On 11/03/2018 06:04, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >>> 11.03.2018 7:01, Grzegorz Junka wrote: >>> >>>>> Just do not assign addresses from same network 10.20.0.0/16 to different network interfaces >>>>> and you will be fine. Assign them all to right interface: >>>>> >>>>> ifconfig_em0="inet 10.20.2.14 netmask 255.255.0.0" >>>>> ifconfig_em0_alias0="inet 10.20.2.15/32" >>>>> ifconfig_igb0_alias0="inet 10.20.2.16/32" >>> Interfaces meant to be all equal, last line should be: >>> >>> ifconfig_em0_alias1="inet 10.20.2.16/32" >>> >> OK, I see. So this is in case I want many IPs assigned to the same >> interface. What if I want one IP assigned to multiple interfaces (i.e. >> so that the additional igb0-3 effectively work as a 4-port switch)? >> > Please consider bonding all NICs as one bridge(4) interface. Then > multiple IPs could be assigned to such interface. > Many thanks Eugene and Marek for your suggestions. I will now need to decide if I want to fragment the network into subnets or bridge the interfaces. GregJ