Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 11 May 2000 09:21:27 +0200
From:      Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To:        Dirk GOUDERS <hank@et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de>
Cc:        Eric Ogren <eogren@earthlink.net>, doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Removing 2.X entries from FAQ? 
Message-ID:  <44254.958029687@axl.ops.uunet.co.za>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 11 May 2000 08:15:01 %2B0200." <200005110615.IAA16382@musashi.et.bocholt.fh-ge.de> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Thu, 11 May 2000 08:15:01 +0200, Dirk GOUDERS wrote:

> Hmm, while having read your posting, I was asking myself, if it would
> be useful, if the different releases include their own FAQ - only
> relevant for that particular release...
> I'm not sure if that subject has already been discussed, some time
> ago.

It has and it was unanimously decided by all (except for a few who don't
actually contribute anything) that it's too much work, given that most
frequently asked questions relate to more than one release.

I agree that ancient, crusty questions should either be removed
(reducing the signal-to-noise ratio of the FAQ) or relegated to a
"legacy FAQ".  Either one takes work, although this work can be
undertaken incremenetally, as individuals notice crusty questions.

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44254.958029687>