From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org  Tue Dec 12 20:12:43 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54BEDE83222
 for <freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 12 Dec 2017 20:12:43 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [78.47.246.247])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEE427075E
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 20:12:42 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221] (may be
 forged))
 by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id vBCKCc76019008
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT);
 Tue, 12 Dec 2017 21:12:38 +0100 (CET)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net
X-Envelope-To: freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net
Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id vBCKCY7R010652;
 Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:12:34 +0700 (+07)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
Subject: Re: Changes to route(8) or routing between r325235 and r326782?
To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>, sthaug@nethelp.no
References: <201712122000.vBCK0nAE088143@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, crest@rlwinm.de
From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
Message-ID: <5A303832.6030909@grosbein.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:12:34 +0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201712122000.vBCK0nAE088143@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, LOCAL_FROM, RDNS_NONE,
 T_DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Spam-Report: * 0.0 T_DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q Date: is 4 days to 4 months after
 Received: *      date
 * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 *      [score: 0.0000] *  2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains
 *  1.9 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on hz.grosbein.net
X-Spam-Level: **
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 20:12:43 -0000

On 13.12.2017 03:00, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:

>> If I want something more complicated (typically BGP) I'll install
>> quagga.
> 
> One of the problems now is that these programs are fighting with
> the kernel over these routes and just fill your logs with lots
> of useless messages and you can not reliably predict the loop
> back routes even if you ARE running a routing protocol daemon.

quagga does not do that. It plays nice with our kernel.

> I also find it hillarious that the code emits a bogous console
> message when I down an interface that it could not delete the
> loopback route

This is already fixed.