From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul 26 06:50:08 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A327BC5
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:50:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6189B2C7C
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:50:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s6Q6o8Pj014040
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:50:08 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 192125] missing resource file in sysutils/xmbmon
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:50:07 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Approval Needed
X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc
Message-ID: <bug-192125-13-HgGQilGrin@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-192125-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-192125-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:50:08 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192125

John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|Needs Triage                |Approval Needed
                 CC|                            |5u623l20@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> ---
This is a great example of why gratuitous and unnecessary use of ${PORTNAME}
can bite you.  maybe this solves the grep x11 resource debate too....

tututani, it would help a committer immensely if you  re-add the patch as an
attachment.  Committers can and do download patches and copy/paste from browser
can be problematic and error-prone.  The request for patches as attachments
goes for future PRs as well.

Remember, committers are free to choose another PR that's easier to process and
may end up skipping yours for this simple reason, so I present this as advice.

Thanks,
John

(notifying maintainer)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.