From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 13 14:30:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1409C1065670 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:30:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E4C8FC15 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:30:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n3DEU5SK060274 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:30:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n3DEU56V060269; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:30:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:30:05 GMT Message-Id: <200904131430.n3DEU56V060269@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org From: Ian Smith Cc: Subject: Re: kern/129103: [ipfw] IPFW check state does not work =( X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ian Smith List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:30:06 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/129103; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ian Smith To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, kes-kes@yandex.ru Cc: Subject: Re: kern/129103: [ipfw] IPFW check state does not work =( Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:01:07 +1000 I believe that I've demonstrated in especially the second of the below posts to freebsd-ipfw that no error is shown by these logs, and that despite the submitter wishing check-state and keep-state rules reported differently than they do, this PR is really more a feature request which if not closed, should be labelled as such. I admit to some remaining confusion re this data in my first post: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/2008-November/003689.html to which Eugen replied privately with less ambiguous data, quoted within http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/2008-November/003693.html Ian