From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 15:20:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5359516A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:20:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from outhub3.tibco.com (outhub3.tibco.com [63.100.100.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9E743D31 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:20:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from BVanValz@tibco.com) Received: from outhub1.tibco.com (outhub1.tibco.com [63.100.100.155]) by outhub3.tibco.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i0UNKLVJ024914; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:20:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from nodnsquery(10.106.128.33) by outhub1.tibco.com via csmap id 8ed2f4ac_537a_11d8_9205_00304811db0b_6770; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:18:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from Tin.War.Tibco.Com (Tin.PGM.war.tibco.com [10.97.128.50]) i0UNKKr8021751; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:20:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.97.128.77] (NewStorm.war.tibco.com [10.97.128.77]) by Tin.War.Tibco.Com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i0UNKJOs020485; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:20:20 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from BVanValz@Tibco.Com) From: Bob Van Valzah To: Bruce M Simpson In-Reply-To: <20040130164551.GE732@saboteur.dek.spc.org> References: <1075477392.83564.4.camel@NewStorm.War.Tibco.Com> <20040130164551.GE732@saboteur.dek.spc.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1075504819.83564.133.camel@NewStorm.War.Tibco.Com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:20:19 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD-Net@FreeBSD.Org Subject: Re: PIM IPv4 user-level process X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:20:23 -0000 On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 10:45, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > We don't have pimsd or pimdd for IPv4 in ports at the moment. > Patches will be gratefully accepted! I downloaded xorp-0.5 to see if I could pull pimsd from it. A quick attempt to compile just pim resulted in an error. I did succeed in compiling the whole thing, but it sure looks like pim was meant to be used as part of the whole xorp thing rather than as a standalone. A port of the whole xorp world might be a better target than just the pim part. That wouldn't take much since it compiled easily. But it is a whopper--nearly 1 GB required to build. Bob