From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 21:07:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0AC316A485 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:07:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr) Received: from arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr (arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr [139.124.41.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469B343D45 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:07:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr) Received: from arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k49L6jhp079369; Tue, 9 May 2006 23:06:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr) Received: (from rv@localhost) by arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k49L6ZmX079368; Tue, 9 May 2006 23:06:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr) X-Authentication-Warning: arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr: rv set sender to herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr using -f Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 23:06:35 +0200 From: Herve Quiroz To: Jean-Baptiste Quenot Message-ID: <20060509210635.GA79343@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr> References: <200605090835.k498ZtPe094952@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200605090835.k498ZtPe094952@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/97023: Maintainer update: fix install problem with www/cocoon X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 21:07:11 -0000 Hi, I'm afraid I don't really understand the relation between a file installed but not listed in pkg-plist and SUB_FILES... Moreover, I don't know if importing a file under the Apache License 2.0 in the ports tree is safe. I need to check on that before I can commit the patch. Herve