From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Jan  5 22:57:11 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id WAA28852
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 22:57:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA28847
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 22:57:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id XAA06029; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 23:59:18 -0700
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 1996 23:59:18 -0700
From: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199601060659.XAA06029@rocky.sri.MT.net>
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Current is looking more stable these days..?
In-Reply-To: <199601060555.QAA09753@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
References: <199601060555.QAA09753@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

Bruce Evans writes:
> >> I'd like to see a 2.1-SNAP first.  We've had quite a few bug
> >> fixes since 2.1-Release.
> 
> >Hmmm.  I just looked through the 206K or so of diffs between
> >RELENG_2_1_0_RELEASE and the RELENG_2_1_0 HEAD and I don't see
> >anything there that would really merit a 2.1 SNAP though..
> 
> Someone should look through the diffs between RELENG_2_1_0 and HEAD to
> see if 2.1++ is missing anything important.  These diffs are also 206K
> or so.  Lines :-(.

I have plans to bring in the sliplogin/slattach stuff, and I'd like to
bring in both the PCMCIA code plus the ibcs2 emulation stuff as well.
I'd also like to see the CVS updated after it gets used some more.

I'd also like to see the new ppp code brought in, and I'd *LOVE* to get
someone to help me fix the dumb ARP bug I've talked about before.

However, I'm not sure what if any of the above is acceptable (actually,
Jordan OK'd the sliplogin and slattach stuff, so I'll bring that in
soon).


Nate