Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 12:46:01 +0700 From: budsz <budsz@kumprang.or.id> To: Michael <michael.lawver@pointoflightproducts.com> Cc: FreeBSD-Questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Question port in ipfw Message-ID: <20021010054601.GA96555@kumprang.or.id> In-Reply-To: <200210092143.37604.michael.lawver@pointoflightproducts.com> References: <20021010043537.GA94881@kumprang.or.id> <200210092143.37604.michael.lawver@pointoflightproducts.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 09:43:37PM -0700, Michael wrote:
>This is a good question and maybe someone can answer the question with regards
>to using a variable to do it.
>
>I do know however that it does support a range because I've used it within my
>rules like this: 1030-1050 but not seperating multiple ranges with comma's.
>
>The one time I did try to use multiple ranges I couldn't get it to work
>either. I just assumed that it was just my lack of knowing how to format it
>and not that it couldn't be done.
In man ipfw explain like:
[-cut-]
With the TCP and UDP protocols, optional ports may be specified
as:
{port|port-port|port:mask}[,port[,...]]
The `-' notation specifies a range of ports (including bound-
aries).
[-cut-]
Well, If I following this manual of couse with multiple ranges port is no
problem. can somebody explain about this?
--
budsz
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9pRQZ9kxLTmJpUwQRAvrZAJ49rcmYKssFRnsa3ts+49/ovw5HegCgq72Q
vaUWJ/HsdZRLxo3IExApAMo=
=TtQP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021010054601.GA96555>