From owner-freebsd-current Tue May 25 22:29:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF7914FF0 for ; Tue, 25 May 1999 22:29:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com) by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.00 #1) id 10mWFb-000Lf8-00; Wed, 26 May 1999 07:29:11 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Sune Stjerneby Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CCD and the new ATA/ATAPI subsystem? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 25 May 1999 19:12:59 +0200." <19990525191258.B1642@hermes.koege-gym.dk> Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 07:29:11 +0200 Message-ID: <83273.927696551@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 25 May 1999 19:12:59 +0200, Sune Stjerneby wrote: > Am I correct in the assumption that CCD and the new ATA/ATAPI subsystem > is a bad combination? It won't let me configure ccd0 when using the adx > rather than wdx syntax.. Without getting into the ccd/vinum comparisons, is there a reason you want to use ad? and not wd? ? AFAIK, wd? works fine with Soren's new driver (well, it's working for me, at any rate). Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message