From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 7 13:39:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9450A37B401; Wed, 7 May 2003 13:39:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529E543F85; Wed, 7 May 2003 13:39:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mobile.pittgoth.com ([192.168.0.5]) by pittgoth.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h47Kd2ZK057108; Wed, 7 May 2003 16:39:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 16:36:09 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: Robert Watson Message-Id: <20030507163609.61cb1de4.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20030507182528.GA91008@perrin.int.nxad.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: hmp@FreeBSD.org cc: DougB@FreeBSD.org cc: des@FreeBSD.org cc: jhb@FreeBSD.org cc: das@FreeBSD.org cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/disks chapter.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 20:39:10 -0000 On Wed, 7 May 2003 16:24:23 -0400 (EDT) Robert Watson wrote: > On Wed, 7 May 2003, Hiten Pandya wrote: > > > > OK. I give up. I have answered atleast 20 mails regarding > > these two commits. If this upsets a lot of committers, than I > > apologise for this well-intentioned commit of mine. > > > > Thanks for the advise. I will keep it in mind. > > Cheers. > > You've run into a bikeshed scenario: the more inconsequential the issue, > the more people are likely to have opinions about it, and feel strongly > that you're wrong. Since bikeshed probabilities often decrease with a > higher level of usefulness in a commit, you may find that focussing on > activities with a higher usefulness measure helps with the problem. > > FWIW, you're not the only committer who's discovered that minor wording > changes from "possibly incorrect" to "possibly correct" bite off more than > they planned for :-). > Stop looking at me... :) -- Tom Rhodes