From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 22:27:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E48316A40F; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:27:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A72543D4C; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:27:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302B71A3C20; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:27:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 11B4C51221; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:27:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:27:10 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Oliver Fromme Message-ID: <20060928222710.GA2029@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060919142455.K1031@ganymede.hub.org> <200609280709.k8S79YID067859@lurza.secnetix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9amGYk9869ThD9tj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200609280709.k8S79YID067859@lurza.secnetix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org, "Marc G. Fournier" Subject: Re: FreeBSD not popular in Asia? X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:27:13 -0000 --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:09:33AM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: > By the way (apropos default policies): Guess why OpenBSD > has gotten ahead of FreeBSD in the statistics? It has been > growing at a much higer rate all the time, and will continue > to do so. Soon the statistics will "prove" that OpenBSD's > user base is ten times larger than FreeBSD's, because we > won't have a bsdstats option in sysinstall in 6.2-Release. > I'd be willing to submit a patch (I'm somewhat familiar > with the sysinstall code), but I assume it's too late > because we're already in code freeze, and sysinstall is > a particularly critical piece of code. Apart from that, > such a patch will probably be shredded to pieces by > bike shed discussions. Just submit it...if it is too late for 6.2 (not guaranteed) then it would be in time for 6.3. The surest way to make sure it never gets into sysinstall is for nobody to ever submit a patch. Kris --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFHEw+Wry0BWjoQKURApRyAJ4g83YD+ptBCyGmA3w2AUU286GJlACfSDgH GfjmlCJ1/NZPO8Vsc1MXgkg= =6IMq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9amGYk9869ThD9tj--