Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 02:16:57 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Olivier Duchateau <duchateau.olivier@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Feedback on xfce-4.10 Message-ID: <4FC34289.4050505@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAHcdu2qUNe_H7iSCjzLVy6BPARy6g6mwOnQQdOuHkUbs8mNcmw@mail.gmail.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1205251530210.63404@wonkity.com> <CAHcdu2qUNe_H7iSCjzLVy6BPARy6g6mwOnQQdOuHkUbs8mNcmw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/26/2012 01:46, Olivier Duchateau wrote:
> 2012/5/25 Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>:
>> > x11/Terminal, print/xfce4-print, and deskutils/xfce4-notifyd all still had
>> > references to libxfce4util.so.5 after upgrading with portmaster.
>> > Reinstalling them individually fixed this.
>
> Yes, it's recommended way, especially when we upgrade Xfce n version
> to n+1 version.
I don't understand this answer. I saw the same thing, even after all of
the above ports were rebuilt. What seems to have happened is that the
above ports (and a bunch of others, my list is below) were rebuilt while
the old libxfce4util was still around, and then it was updated later.
Do we need to rejigger the dependencies so that libxfce4util is rebuilt
during an upgrade before any of the ports that depend on it?
Doug
Terminal-0.4.8
mousepad-0.2.16_9
orage-4.8.3
squeeze-0.2.3_3
swt-3.5.2
xfce4-appfinder-4.10.0
xfce4-notifyd-0.2.2_1
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FC34289.4050505>