From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 14 19:11:41 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from smtp2.vnet.net (smtp2.vnet.net [166.82.1.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D1414C4F for ; Wed, 14 Apr 1999 19:11:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rivers@dignus.com) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp2.vnet.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA12678; Wed, 14 Apr 1999 22:10:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA01394; Wed, 14 Apr 1999 22:09:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.2/8.6.9) id WAA03010; Wed, 14 Apr 1999 22:09:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 22:09:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <199904150209.WAA03010@lakes.dignus.com> To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, lcremeans@erols.com, roberto@keltia.freenix.fr Subject: Re: NT4 server 2.5 times faster than Linux In-Reply-To: <19990414200907.A1423@erols.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > On Thu, Apr 15, 1999 at 12:02:08AM +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote: > > According to Lee Cremeans: > > > Or *did* they think of it? If you look closely, you'll find the following > > > blurb in the paper: > > > > Even more, there is a another "comparison" from the same guys between NT4 > > and Novell. Interestingly enough, NT seem to win against Novell as well > > (which make the "test" even more suspect). > > Yup; I get the distinct impression that Mindcraft are a bunch of > shills-for-hire; they'll make your system win if you say so and pay 'em > enough. > Perhaps we should take up contributions and hire them to compare Windows and FreeBSD (before Microsoft does) :-) - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message