From owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan  8 17:39:39 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-python@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9E80D16A4CE; Thu,  8 Jan 2004 17:39:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 238E243D55; Thu,  8 Jan 2004 17:39:38 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id C188E146F9; Thu,  8 Jan 2004 19:39:37 -0600 (CST)
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 19:39:37 -0600 (CST)
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho
To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
In-Reply-To: <1073611849.799.2.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401081933420.27987-100000@pancho>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: ports@freebsd.org
cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
cc: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>
cc: Hye-Shik Chang <perky@hub.freebsd.org>
cc: python@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: New mailing list: freebsd-python
X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues <freebsd-python.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python>,
	<mailto:freebsd-python-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-python>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-python@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-python-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python>,
	<mailto:freebsd-python-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 01:39:39 -0000

> What?  PRs assigned to gnome tend to rot?  You may want to have a look
> at your stats before saying something like that.

I have checked, and you are completely correct and I am completely wrong.
I apologize.

In fact (including the phoenix ones), there are exactly four, one
of which I'm attempting to work on with the submitter.

All I can say is that I must be confusing the build error reports
with the PR reports, or am still not over my sinus infection, or ...
"something".

(There _are_ more than 4 build errors :-) , some of which look
like they were from a bad run on ia64-5-full.)

> As for PRs assigned to phoenix@, those should be moved over to gnome@.

I will do this.

Again, sorry about shooting from the hip.  IMHO we all have
the same goals here: make the ports collection as useful as
possible.

mcl