Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 11 Sep 2010 16:11:48 -0700
From:      perryh@pluto.rain.com
To:        aryeh.friedman@gmail.com
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: How to disallow logout
Message-ID:  <4c8c0cb4.n0Z%2Br%2BTIC4vzdXnS%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimzokJ_yp3uOe93FUpAs7AOznhKBBDdHxiQ1n9_@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <AANLkTin93An%2BUORiwHe%2BXdcgxj%2BpeXV1B2xvu81r_1CG@mail.gmail.com> <201009111510.o8BFAnJ9011318@lurza.secnetix.de> <AANLkTimzokJ_yp3uOe93FUpAs7AOznhKBBDdHxiQ1n9_@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would prefer to have the plain text around after a power failure
> because it could be several days of work ...

Ideally there should be _some_ mechanism for committing unfinished
work to a (probably encrypted) repository on, at least, a daily
basis.

The more I see of this thread, the more it seems that the problem
is largely the fault of the particular VCS being used.  A VCS that
demands a "review" step before anything can be checked in, even on a
"work in progress" branch as opposed to the mainline, seems a poor
fit for a project in which developers are not permitted to see one
anothers code.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4c8c0cb4.n0Z%2Br%2BTIC4vzdXnS%perryh>