Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:19:19 -0400 (EDT)
From:      John Von Essen <essenz@beck.quonix.net>
To:        "Paul A. Hoadley" <paulh@logicsquad.net>
Cc:        freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Max OS X and BSD
Message-ID:  <20040410231232.S97005@beck.quonix.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040410022715.GL85168@grover.logicsquad.net>
References:  <91A01A3C-89D8-11D8-91B3-0003933DDCFA@essenz.com> <20040410022715.GL85168@grover.logicsquad.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes, thats the same webobjects. I played with it a bit back in 97 when it
came with the academic/development version of OPENSTEP 4.2.

I called it ill-fated because Apple was pushing it hard a few years back,
now they have eased off. I dont see it lasting. For starters, your
confined to the Mac hardware platform.

-john

On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Paul A. Hoadley wrote:

> [Moved to -chat because of my question below.]
>
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 11:47:05PM -0400, John Von Essen wrote:
>
> > (along with the ill-fated WebObjects)
>
> As an aside, are you referring to this product, or something else?
>
> http://www.apple.com/webobjects/
>
> I've never really looked at it, but a few friends at small- and
> medium-sized shops in Australia use it extensively.  Do you think it's
> ill-fated?
>
>
> --
> Paul.
>
> mailto:paulh@logicsquad.net
>


Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040410231232.S97005>