From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 4 06:01:22 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0EA6FC8B59 for ; Fri, 4 May 2018 06:01:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [46.251.251.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "0x20.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72705783FB for ; Fri, 4 May 2018 06:01:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e.0x20.net) Received: from e.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [46.251.251.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57CD84BEDF; Fri, 4 May 2018 07:56:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e.0x20.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w445uAPt004847; Fri, 4 May 2018 07:56:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars) Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 07:56:10 +0200 From: Lars Engels To: Walter Schwarzenfeld Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: issue with sudo-1.8.23 Message-ID: <20180504055609.GT83184@e.0x20.net> References: <2f2ae93b-1b77-edb7-3aa4-c5a339b03b74@utanet.at> <038c85cd-dac3-dd64-9717-ffbd4bd18dbc@utanet.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <038c85cd-dac3-dd64-9717-ffbd4bd18dbc@utanet.at> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 8.0 User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 06:01:23 -0000 On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 09:15:14PM +0200, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > In this version /var/run/sudo is changed to /run/sudo. If /var/run/sudo > in the pkg-plist causes the problem if a directory /run exists. > > But solved, fixed by maintainer. Can we please revert this to /var/run? /run is some canker coming from systemd http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Linux-distributions-to-include-run-directory-1219006.htm.