From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 31 23:30:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2256A106566B for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:30:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9228FC13 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:30:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0VNUAqY089324 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:30:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p0VNUAuI089320; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:30:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:30:10 GMT Message-Id: <201101312330.p0VNUAuI089320@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org From: PseudoCylon Cc: Subject: Re: kern/153938: [run] [panic] [patch] Workaround for use-after-free panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: PseudoCylon List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:30:11 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/153938; it has been noted by GNATS. From: PseudoCylon To: Juergen Lock Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org, Juergen Lock Subject: Re: kern/153938: [run] [panic] [patch] Workaround for use-after-free panic Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:28:25 -0800 (PST) ----- Original Message ---- > From: Juergen Lock > To: PseudoCylon > Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org; Juergen Lock > Sent: Sun, January 30, 2011 2:50:42 PM > Subject: Re: kern/153938: [run] [panic] [patch] Workaround for use-after-free >panic > > On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:35:14PM -0800, PseudoCylon wrote: > > > Anyway, I have been testing this version for maybe a week now and it > seems to work at least no worse than the previous one, minus the > deadlock. :) So it probably can go in. > > Thanx! > Juergen > Thanks for testing. I'll submit the patch. AK