From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 17 20:51:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91765106566C; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 20:51:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B518FC12; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 20:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (host86-163-246-207.range86-163.btcentralplus.com [86.163.246.207]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3FAAC46B0C; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 16:51:28 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "Robert N. M. Watson" In-Reply-To: <8662e3m3eq.fsf@kopusha.home.net> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 20:51:25 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <82D45B12-1739-4007-8B23-E8B5565F1BBB@FreeBSD.org> References: <8662e3m3eq.fsf@kopusha.home.net> To: Mikolaj Golub X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Kostik Belousov Subject: Re: a sysctl for process binary osreldate X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 20:51:29 -0000 On 17 Mar 2012, at 19:30, Mikolaj Golub wrote: > Currently we can check and change binary osreldate of another process = via > procfs(5). >=20 > Kostik suggested to add a new sysctl for the same purpose and also = extend > procstat to show osrel. >=20 > Here are patches I am going to commit if there are no objections or > suggestions. >=20 > http://people.freebsd.org/~trociny/kern_proc_osrel.1.patch > http://people.freebsd.org/~trociny/procstat.osrel.1.patch >=20 > I set the same permissions as for procfs(5) osrel -- so only user can = read it, > but may be this is too restrictive and p_cansee on read would be ok? >=20 > I added osrel output to procstat -b option: >=20 > kopusha:~% procstat -b 2975 > PID COMM OSREL PATH > 2975 emacs 1000001 /usr/local/bin/emacs-23.3 >=20 > Would this be ok or someone see a better way? Support for writing the field seems to violate the synchronisation = protocol defined for p_osrel in proc.h. In the new world order, is this = simply a documentation bug, or is it also a software bug? Robert=