From owner-freebsd-scsi Mon Dec 11 11:42:48 2000 From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 11:42:47 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from aslan.scsiguy.com (aslan.scsiguy.com [63.229.232.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3673C37B400 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 11:42:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from aslan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aslan.scsiguy.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id eBBJges02409; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 12:42:40 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from gibbs@aslan.scsiguy.com) Message-Id: <200012111942.eBBJges02409@aslan.scsiguy.com> To: mjacob@feral.com Cc: Reverend K Kanno , David Miller , freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: LUN 1 on 3.2-R? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 11 Dec 2000 11:34:52 PST." Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 12:42:39 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: gibbs@aslan.scsiguy.com Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > >Look at the INQUIRY data for the pass devices- they're Processor type for lun >1 && lun 2. The lack of a peripheral driver doesn't have anything to do with whether luns are supported or not. It also doesn't preclude the system from talking to the array as a disk. David seemed to imply that the Chapparal arrays didn't work *at all*. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message