From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 19:11:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A4416A406 for ; Thu, 17 May 2007 19:11:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kayve@sfsu.edu) Received: from iron2.sfsu.edu (iron2.sfsu.edu [130.212.10.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF92C13C465 for ; Thu, 17 May 2007 19:11:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kayve@sfsu.edu) Received: from smtp01.sfsu.edu ([130.212.10.100]) by iron2.sfsu.edu with ESMTP; 17 May 2007 12:11:17 -0700 X-onepass: IPPSC X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAHBFTEaC1Apk/2dsb2JhbAA Received: from libra.sfsu.edu ([130.212.10.238]) by mail05a.sfsu.edu (Lotus Domino Release 7.0) with ESMTP id 2007051712111567-383 ; Thu, 17 May 2007 12:11:15 -0700 Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 12:11:15 -0700 (PDT) From: KAYVEN RIESE To: John Nielsen In-Reply-To: <200705171446.33965.lists@jnielsen.net> Message-ID: References: <464B114C.5080703@net4.in> <44irarz7fs.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <200705171446.33965.lists@jnielsen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on MAIL05a/SERVERS/SFSU(Release 7.0|August 18, 2005) at 05/17/2007 12:11:15, Serialize by Router on SMTP01/SERVERS/SFSU(Release 7.0.2FP1HF155 | March 20, 2007) at 05/17/2007 12:11:16, Serialize complete at 05/17/2007 12:11:16 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xfce4 broke after pkgdb -Ff X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 19:11:18 -0000 On Thu, 17 May 2007, John Nielsen wrote: > On Thursday 17 May 2007 02:37:15 pm KAYVEN RIESE wrote: >> On Thu, 17 May 2007, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >>> Please don't top-post. >>> >>> KAYVEN RIESE writes: >>>> so the "-r" option will be the significant difference for the >>>> portupgrade comamnd, just verifying >>> >>> Yes. Otherwise, you may end up with some of the ports that depend on >>> pango being unable to use the new version. >>> >>> Make sure you look through the UPDATING file to see if there are any >>> other issues you need to take special action for at the same time. >> >> this guy seems to disagree >> >> jnielsendotnet:Try what I asked in my first reply (deleting and >> reinstalling pango manually), and see if you can get any error messages >> from xfce. >> >> If portupgrade -f is failing portupgrade -fr isn't likely to succeed >> either. > > Portupgrade with the -r option is very useful, and you will probably want to > use it. My point was that _before_ you try that you should figure out why > portupgrade is failing to upgrade pango, and/or upgrade it manually. > Otherwise it will just keep failing. > > JN > i guess i can see how u guys r on the same page then. he says -r won't help, u say it's nice. makes sense