From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Thu May 14 08:19:02 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D92D2E9365 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 08:19:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49N4FL1vySz43KD for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 08:19:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3F9742E9364; Thu, 14 May 2020 08:19:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5D82E9363 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 08:19:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49N4FL11xlz43KC for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 08:19:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EBB77D52 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 08:19:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 04E8J2Ts090415 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 08:19:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 04E8J20A090414 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 08:19:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 241347] security/sssd: Update to 1.16.4 Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 08:19:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: the_mix_room@hotmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 08:19:02 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D241347 --- Comment #23 from the_mix_room@hotmail.com --- I played around a little with this yesterday. Having missed this entry I initially tired to recreate it myself.=20 The work generally looks good, and I only have some minor comments on all t= hree patches, I think they seem quite similar and would benefit from being merged into one.=20 * patch-src_external_pac__responder.m4 is renamed patch-src__external_pac__responder.m4, ( s/_/__/ which is correct - there w= as a _ missing previously) Inside the attachment 212864 there are changes to whi= ch versions are included, previously 1.17* was included, now it is 1.17 * HOST_NAME_MAX is replaced by _POSIX_HOST_NAME_MAX in the code, instead of previously being defined in Makefile.am. Perhaps it would be easier to use = an ifndef-block instead. I used sysconf(_SC_HOST_NAME_MAX) instead of the cons= tant _POSIX_HOST_NAME_MAX. On my machine they are the same value, but I do not t= hink there is guarantees for this.=20 * CONFIGURE_ARGS in Makefile have changed order, this makes it quite diffic= ult to follow what has been added or changed. * 1.16.4 has been replaced by 1.16.5 in the meantime. Other than that I will add myself to the list of people that would like to = test this when there is a suitable patch. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=