From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 12:32:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 174B1D1C for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 12:32:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x231.google.com (mail-qg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4BD3EC4 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 12:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id z60so24613503qgd.8 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 05:32:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=CnCE+iObZoP6A2+uaRu7umIA1xfZWgZss2iSlukvtdk=; b=LSMfPZVN1dSFA5hhU2uGaIXtOt2wF2FVvmySnERD4MyGrGjTXWfZIaIhijTBEurKeA kYuTKedvSLHDFYue7yfL2Du05F71YtcDJRUanVr60BnAAslpO+WEYJs1wuHGq7ahBpzG 8mPxNC3uSYzJSSeCPUPyFN0tw4uHb0FSaJ62Y= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=CnCE+iObZoP6A2+uaRu7umIA1xfZWgZss2iSlukvtdk=; b=U1hjURE6n27VzWfXNwg7lwEwEVc9HfDzlgBZgpGiYZfOq7JnXbR1ISvoZR8hQwL+EN 3/tcFJkBgyCKZTEeoSpJw7auB7Ok1trhhwtXDhOrSz86mNeph9TzCvDmWeocGlLrcayb tKwBdTxIOEOG1pterqha7IrQIOJB0pgFDxAsEWxbgHfhjtLVFE/2XnzerUf15+Z1sd+A tQoJD8SXVyYnDsaGPiF8zD/nYBXcAJ5yzLczlf1Th4K+cvcsdZYk1lh7EzGoCsfmjYL1 jaLKh0OB8nL14ToSRhsP+X6//WSJXeA1qEYZpsirgwF3MOcQzm3r3D1r761DX/ti5fPh cuzg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn4F2MvTnkc8h7Jm/u2CBvWXQlPVkscMw4FexdJy3y5AeckZx+PGRWnxIKvD4mAUBfmcsC6 X-Received: by 10.140.104.103 with SMTP id z94mr2036184qge.91.1394541139916; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 05:32:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lists@eitanadler.com Received: by 10.96.147.225 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 05:31:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <531EFFF8.2080604@marino.st> References: <20140311110549.GK6900@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <531EFFF8.2080604@marino.st> From: Eitan Adler Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 08:31:49 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: TJMtm9o1f363GY8qgW3JQQb1bkY Message-ID: Subject: Re: new USES=tar ? To: marino@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 12:32:21 -0000 On 11 March 2014 08:22, John Marino wrote: > On 3/11/2014 13:16, Eitan Adler wrote: >> On 11 March 2014 07:05, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> To be able to migrate most of the zip files to use bsdtar when they case we have >>> added USES=zip[:infozip] for consistency I do plan to make the same kind of USES >>> for every kind of archivers. I am puzzled on how to handle all the tar >>> extensions what would your propose? >>> >>> One USES per extension? (USES=xz, USES=bzip2 etc?) >>> >>> or One USES=tar with arguments for extensions? >> >> Why does tar need an extension? why can't tar use the DISTFILE >> itself? tar supports auto-detection of the format which it is >> unzipping. > > For the automatic DISTFILES definition I assume. Can we not use the existing solution of EXTRACT_SUFX ? -- Eitan Adler Source, Ports, Doc committer Bugmeister, Ports Security teams