Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:43:59 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Markus Trippelsdorf <Markus@trippelsdorf.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: so much clock interrupts?! Message-ID: <20051124204359.GD30073@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <slrndoarjo.2d8m.Markus@bsd.trippelsdorf.de> References: <20051124013438.T8326@chylonia.3miasto.net> <slrndoarjo.2d8m.Markus@bsd.trippelsdorf.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--hxkXGo8AKqTJ+9QI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 07:40:40AM +0000, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On 2005-11-24, Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net> wrote: > > that's what i see in systat with FreeBSD 6.0/i386-SMP > > > > > > 540 534 99 pdwak 2000 = cpu0: time > > 16825 pdpgs 2000 = cpu1: time > > > > > > on FreeBSD 5.3 live CD i have 100 not 2000 times per second > > > > isn't it too much?! >=20 > Yes it is. > That's why I have kern.hz=3D"100" in my /boot/loader.conf . Have you been able to measure a performance benefit from reducing it? Have you shown that reducing it does not cause your performance to *drop*? It was increased for a reason..it actually increases performance on some workloads. Kris --hxkXGo8AKqTJ+9QI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDhiYPWry0BWjoQKURAmzYAJ96qlY/c3tV4SdoABOiIB6SCCG36wCaAxJq GQ4PiorNI9rAMixpJGvXL8Q= =+Br2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hxkXGo8AKqTJ+9QI--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051124204359.GD30073>