From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 25 18:18:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE0E0A84 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:18:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-x230.google.com (mail-oa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7A3C180A for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:18:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id g12so833902oah.7 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:18:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=kvP3Drwv/K27lWI5UFH2IJ4sPF4S2lFOr7PIyVqjaac=; b=ImrG61UW2LxSyZOOH7z8lCJGNYIKucXbNKwK3RihYTKhgSxY/wsXqHiVr8TAI+Us6O cr62Tkguv+UIxrvBrwjfY7QXgjAM6jTWLaiY5jpSxTALiFO2JSh8VAwddmufuJvkFIIK U3RC/YYT221jSqzCXSbm0CzpIUdZyFDtN8wgnguLQDkja/6R60R74CVcGwB/mRtYz6z1 /DHXhhkUpJRPrGg2I9h7SptKvta+yeG4R3QISDzyjQtensp23G4bNO96MJ8mz1KW1lOD 2ilY6OdrDzDvpgMQygOzND/oo+ZvOVey7veX7Bv8N4mWCymVOcOpL4+nynHi5Y+trwTO fuBg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.146.235 with SMTP id tf11mr2545146oeb.63.1393352294061; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:18:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.130.196 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:18:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:18:13 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Intel X540 T2 From: Ryan Stone To: Johan Kooijman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:18:15 -0000 This sounds like it might be the issue where large NFS transfers over TSO exceed the maximum number of segments supported by ixgbe (or other drivers). There is a thread on it: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2014-January/037694.html Workaround would include: - Disable TSO on the ixgbe port with "ifconfig ix0 -tso". There would be a performance impact on the NFS server. - Decrease rsize/wsize parameters on the ESXi client mounts to 32K or lower. There would be a performance impact on both the NFS server and the clients.