From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 5 13:07:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD3FEFD0 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 13:07:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cu01176a.smtpx.saremail.com (cu01176a.smtpx.saremail.com [195.16.150.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69F729BF for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 13:07:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.2.2] (izaro.sarenet.es [192.148.167.11]) by proxypop03.sare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DCCE89DDFEF; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 14:07:22 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Fix Emulex "oce" driver in CURRENT Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Borja Marcos In-Reply-To: <5481AC78.6050107@multiplay.co.uk> Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 14:07:13 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <201406301402.42119.jhb@freebsd.org> <8BA1A243-8EA9-449A-A2D2-4E03487CE3E0@sarenet.es> <5481AC78.6050107@multiplay.co.uk> To: Steven Hartland X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 13:07:35 -0000 On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Steven Hartland wrote: >=20 > On 04/09/2014 09:49, Borja Marcos wrote: >> On Jun 30, 2014, at 8:02 PM, John Baldwin wrote: >>=20 >>> I think these sound fine, but I've cc'd Xin Li (delphij@) who has = worked with >>> folks at Emulex to maintain this driver. He is probably the best = person to >>> review this. >> Hi, >>=20 >> Seems 10.1 is on the pipeline now, but as far as I know none of these = fixes have been applied to -STABLE. Any chances to do it yet? As far as = I know, the "oce" driver is currently unusable in -STABLE. I managed to = cause a panic reliably within 30 seconds. >=20 > Was there any conclusion to this, current and releng/10.0 & = releng/10.1 seem pretty similar with regards oce but a customer is = reporting panics very similar to this thread. >=20 > Did the commit of the additional locking never make it in? Not as far as I know. I=B4ve updated a couple of machines here to = 10-STABLE and I've been applying the patch manually myself.=20 I don't think it's been applied even to -HEAD.=20 For now I've told my coworkers to avoid Emulex cards whenever possible. = As far as I know the driver is unusable in its present state. Borja.