From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 18:07:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53677106564A for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:07:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dieterbsd@engineer.com) Received: from imr-da03.mx.aol.com (imr-da03.mx.aol.com [205.188.105.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152B48FC18 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:07:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imo-ma04.mx.aol.com (imo-ma04.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.139]) by imr-da03.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p2SHvPD3023760 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:57:25 -0400 Received: from dieterbsd@engineer.com by imo-ma04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id n.1098.1471c06 (45278) for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:57:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtprly-dd01.mx.aol.com (smtprly-dd01.mx.aol.com [205.188.84.129]) by cia-mc03.mx.aol.com (v129.9) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMC038-d3e64d90cbfb2b0; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:57:22 -0400 Received: from web-mmc-d02 (web-mmc-d02.sim.aol.com [205.188.103.68]) by smtprly-dd01.mx.aol.com (v129.9) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDD012-d3e64d90cbfb2b0; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:57:15 -0400 To: hackers@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:57:15 -0400 X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-AOL-IP: 67.206.163.248 X-MB-Message-Type: User MIME-Version: 1.0 From: dieterbsd@engineer.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Mail.com Webmail 33456-STANDARD Received: from 67.206.163.248 by web-mmc-d02.sysops.aol.com (205.188.103.68) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:57:15 -0400 Message-Id: <8CDBB88B5271976-11D4-322B@web-mmc-d02.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag: NO X-AOL-SENDER: dieterbsd@engineer.com Cc: Subject: Re: Keeping /etc/localtime up-to-date X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:07:43 -0000 > And while I (think I) recall that the equivalent of /etc/localtime > was implemented in some version of SunOS many years ago as a symlink, > I believe that approach could be problematic for FreeBSD, as it > could impose some unintended requirements on some of the start-up > scripts. I have been running FreeBSD and NetBSD with /etc/localtime being a symlink for years and have not seen any problems as a result.