From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 16 16:02:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F5737B401 for ; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 16:02:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 680D343F75 for ; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 16:02:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7GN2sQX007095; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 16:02:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h7GN2ska007094; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 16:02:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 16:02:54 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Eriq Lamar Message-ID: <20030816230254.GA7037@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200308161810.38287.eqe@cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200308161810.38287.eqe@cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: when should 5.x be stable enough for web servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 23:02:57 -0000 On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 06:10:38PM -0400, Eriq Lamar wrote: > On i386 hardware and two processors amd mp. should I wait for 5.2. (*shrug*) some people are already using it. It is very stable for most people now, but if you run into a bug, it is probably a show-stopper type. If you have multiple web servers, it would be nice to try 5.1-CURRENT and report how you find it compairs to 4.x.