From owner-freebsd-current Mon May 15 20:55: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rah.star-gate.com (216-200-29-190.snj0.flashcom.net [216.200.29.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 330E337BA0D for ; Mon, 15 May 2000 20:55:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA63281; Mon, 15 May 2000 20:54:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <200005160354.UAA63281@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Motif is now Open Source 8) In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 15 May 2000 21:52:03 MDT." <200005160352.VAA13667@nomad.yogotech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 20:54:15 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > I have a copy. However, the license is 'interesting' enough to read > > > that I'm not sure it can be used inside the JDK distribution, so if > > > someone can give me an explanation that I can understand that I'm legal > > > to distribute the library as part of an application, please show me in > > > terms a mere engineer can understand. > > > > I think that you no longer have to include Motif with the JDK. > > Just let the distribution of Motif come from freebsd.org , i.e., > > a port or a package. > > Too much hassle IMO. I'd *much* rather distribute it as part of the > package, and I'm looking into how feasible it would be to distribute > inside of the JDK. > Well, just asked them because I don't see any problems in doing what you want because is for an Open Source Operating System. -- Amancio Hasty hasty@rah.star-gate.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message