From owner-freebsd-current Sun Sep 27 15:30:38 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA00248 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 15:30:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (spinner.netplex.com.au [202.12.86.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA29924; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 15:29:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spinner.netplex.com.au (8.9.1/8.9.1/Spinner) with ESMTP id TAA12426; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 19:02:40 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from peter@spinner.netplex.com.au) Message-Id: <199809271102.TAA12426@spinner.netplex.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Tor.Egge@fast.no cc: mike@smith.net.au, fn@radio-do.de, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Weired top display at smp current kernel from today In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 25 Sep 1998 22:24:58 +0200." <199809252024.WAA00593@midten.fast.no> Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 19:02:39 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Tor.Egge@fast.no wrote: > > Sounds like a bug in the ELF image activator. It's possible that > > something got bent when the corefile writing code went in (waves dead > > poultry speculatively). > > It is a bug in cpu_fork(). > > pcb_mpnest should be initialized to 1. Yes, I agree. cpu_fork() is special now that it does not preserve any of the current lock nesting context and returns once through the system call interface into userland on the new process. Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message