From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Feb 16 01:12:38 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA04482
          for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 01:12:38 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from amsoft.ru (amsoft.ru [194.87.86.241])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA04372
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 01:11:23 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from am@amsoft.ru)
Received: (from am@localhost) by amsoft.ru (8.8.8/amsoft/1.0)
	id MAA01505 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 12:02:43 +0300 (MSK)
From: Andrew Maltsev <am@amsoft.ru>
Message-Id: <199802160902.MAA01505@amsoft.ru>
Subject: system compilation parameters
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 12:02:42 +0300 (MSK)
Organization: AM'soft
X-Location: Oryol (http://www.oryol.ru/), Russia
X-Phone: +7 086 229 9988
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

What about compiling -stable with "gcc -O3" or "egcs" or "pgcc" (on
P-Pro)? Will the system be stable? Will the kernel be stable?
I think pgcc will add a lot to overall perfomance.. will it?

Is there any good/bad expirience with that?

Btw, wcarchive is PPro? How the system was compiled on it?

Andrew.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message