From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 28 16:03:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32ACF16A4CE for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:03:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outcold.yadt.co.uk (outcold.yadt.co.uk [81.187.204.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9603A43D1F for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:03:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from davidt@yadt.co.uk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outcold.yadt.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C261DD59C; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:04:20 +0100 (BST) Received: from outcold.yadt.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (outcold.yadt.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01466-14; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:04:14 +0100 (BST) Received: by outcold.yadt.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 27C251DD58F; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:04:14 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:04:14 +0100 From: David Taylor To: Jonathan Gray Message-ID: <20050428160414.GA21634@outcold.yadt.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Jonathan Gray , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20050428154859.GA16433@mail.netspace.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050428154859.GA16433@mail.netspace.net.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.2.1 (20041222) at yadt.co.uk cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: incorrect statement on www page X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:03:51 -0000 On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Jonathan Gray wrote: > I came across the following incorrect statement when > browsing http://www.freebsd.org > > "FreeBSD is available free of charge and comes with full source code" > > Sadly I do not think this has been true for some time. > > Perhaps this might be more appropriate wording: > > - and comes with full source code. If you would like to > + and comes with partial source code. If you would like to Perhaps you could explain to those of us that have no idea what you're talking about. What parts of the source code are missing? -- David Taylor