From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 27 16:00:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD251065699 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:00:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [91.103.162.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FCCB8FC2D for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:00:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost.codelab.cz [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DCB419E027; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:00:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (r5bb235.net.upc.cz [86.49.61.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EF5219E023; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:00:26 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4905E5BD.2020809@quip.cz> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:01:01 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: cz, cs, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, grafan@gmail.com, gamato@users.sf.net References: <200810271343.m9RDhfNQ013868@lurza.secnetix.de> In-Reply-To: <200810271343.m9RDhfNQ013868@lurza.secnetix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: journaling filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:00:32 -0000 Oliver Fromme wrote: > martinko wrote: > > Rong-en Fan wrote: > > > In NetBSD, they now have metadata journaling support, see > > > > > > http://www.netbsd.org/changes/#wapbl > > > > > > I'm not a fs guru, I just want to know what are the status of > > > BluFFS and UFS journaling support which were mentioned > > > in recent years. > > > > This is very interesting! I can imagine this would be the way for > > systems where ZFS is not an option but SU are reaching their limits. > > Have you had a look at gjournal(8)? I played with a gjournal, it is simple and working, but not usable where performance matters. A write performance is degraded to about half of a performance without gjournal (with a gjournal on top of a gmirror it is even more slower) Miroslav Lachman