Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 21:57:31 +0300 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Steven Hartland <steven@multiplay.co.uk> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r292379 - in head/sys: netinet netinet6 Message-ID: <20151217185731.GK42340@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5672C6AE.7070407@freebsd.org> References: <201512162226.tBGMQSvs098886@repo.freebsd.org> <20151217003824.GG42340@FreeBSD.org> <5672C6AE.7070407@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Steven, On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 02:29:02PM +0000, Steven Hartland wrote: S> Hey Gleb, sorry I didn't wait for your review, but I did ask around on what S> the timeout for this would be and was informed 2 weeks and as it had been S> over a month, with quite a bit of feedback from others in the area, all S> of which S> had been addressed I thought that was reasonable. S> S> A simple reply of "I do intend to review but don't have time yet so S> please wait" S> I think would be useful in these types of situations, as I know S> everyone's busy S> but its impossible to know what others are thinking. Of course it is my fault that I don't review everything phabricator sends to me, which is a lot. Because it is so easy to add a bunch of subscribers to a revision. However, in the good old pre-phabricator times, people used to send email directly to each other. Those email arrive to my regular mailbox, which I check as often as I can. You could ping me via email. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151217185731.GK42340>