From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 21 06:02:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19EC416A4CE for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 06:02:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from office.cheeze.org (office.cheeze.org [24.97.255.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9217743D1D for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 06:02:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jubal+freebsdports+20041121@cheeze.org) Received: from office.cheeze.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by office.cheeze.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iAL62dus098619 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 01:02:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (jubal@localhost)iAL62dHo098616 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 01:02:39 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: office.cheeze.org: jubal owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 01:02:39 -0500 (EST) From: Jubal Kessler X-X-Sender: jubal@office.cheeze.org To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041121004903.M98572@office.cheeze.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/585/Thu Nov 11 07:22:42 2004 clamav-milter version 0.80j on office.cheeze.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: Help with forcing ruby port install X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 06:02:41 -0000 David Ross said: > Please use the Ruby stable snapshot from ruby-lang.org. I've no idea why > they use the preview in ports. Snaoshot is perfectly fine. Yes, even in > production use. I tell clients to use it, you should too ;) David, thank you for the suggestion. However (and I address this to the FreeBSD ports mantainers): All I want is functional portupgrade(1) for FreeBSD. Please, port maintainers, consider portupgrade a bit more of a priority. Having this ruby18 blocking is causing me to waste considerable time looking for a workaround. --Jubal