From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 10 20:55:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1CD16A4CE for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:55:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from vette.gigo.com (vette.gigo.com [216.218.228.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F41143FAF for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:55:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lioux@brturbo.com) Received: from 200.101.111.208 (200-101-111-208.bsace705.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br [200.101.111.208]) by vette.gigo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B254856E0 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:47:17 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 26846 invoked by uid 1001); 11 Nov 2003 04:07:35 -0000 Message-ID: <20031111040735.26845.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> Received: (qmail 74221 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2003 11:17:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 26 Oct 2003 11:17:38 -0000 Received: from pop3.uol.com.br by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.5) for lioux-freebsd@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:17:16 -0200 (BRST) Received: from peart.uol.com.br (172.26.5.199) by mtauol7.mail.sys.intranet (5.1.071) id 3EDB5C0C01D6F9CD for lioux-freebsd@uol.com.br; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 08:16:54 -0300 Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [216.136.204.119]) by storm2.uol.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E04EE56 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:16:53 -0200 (BRST) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16FE567C5 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 03:16:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-src-committers@FreeBSD.org) Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 182E116A52B; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 03:16:46 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: lioux@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 538) id E560316A4C0; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 03:16:44 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: src-committers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E012A16A4B3; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 03:16:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.broadpark.no (mail.broadpark.no [217.13.4.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C068F43F85; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 03:16:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (37.80-203-228.nextgentel.com [80.203.228.37]) by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BAC79A34; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 12:16:10 +0100 (MET) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id AC8879C049; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 12:16:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (dwp.des.no [10.0.0.4]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id EE7479BFF3; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 12:16:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id E7BD5B823; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 12:16:06 +0100 (CET) To: Alfred Perlstein References: <200310251614.h9PGE925019013@repoman.freebsd.org> <20031025233749.GW99943@elvis.mu.org> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) In-Reply-To: <20031025233749.GW99943@elvis.mu.org> (Alfred Perlstein's message of "Sat, 25 Oct 2003 16:37:49 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on dsa.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 Sender: owner-src-committers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Robert Watson cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_sig.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 04:55:39 -0000 X-Original-Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 12:16:06 +0100 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 04:55:39 -0000 Alfred Perlstein writes: > This is bad, it's time to add a flag to the vnode to do this > properly instead of relying upon the underlying FS to implement > the locking. Sounds like a layering violation to me - or am I talking out of my nether regions? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no