From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 20 14:20:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40FC16A4F9 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:20:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.mho.com (smtp.mho.net [64.58.4.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E79343D2F for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:20:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 59991 invoked by uid 1002); 20 Feb 2004 22:20:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.4.1.17?) (64.58.1.252) by smtp.mho.net with SMTP; 20 Feb 2004 22:20:30 -0000 Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:21:43 -0700 (MST) From: Scott Long X-X-Sender: scottl@pooker.samsco.home To: Michael Nottebrock In-Reply-To: <200402202314.08563.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Message-ID: <20040220152003.B46178@pooker.samsco.home> References: <200402191908.42575.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <200402202314.08563.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Filesystem support on DVD-RAMs X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 22:20:33 -0000 On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Thursday 19 February 2004 19:08, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > I've cc'd -current because I'd > > like to know if the situation is any different in -CURRENT / 5.2 and > > because someone might want to append the table with results for UDF 1.5 and > > UDF 2.0, which I didn't bother to test because UDF support still isn't > > MFC'd. > > Okay, so I've done it myself already, with the help of a 5.2-Release-p1 > FreeSBIE from GUFI. The Linux used is still the Knoppix 3.2 from the previous > tests, with udftools 1.0.0b2 compiled from source. > > The numbers in the table indicate the UDF version. > > > | Linux | FreeBSD | Windows | Windows | > | (2.4.20) | 5.2R-p1 | 2000 SP4 (*) | 98 SE (*) | > ------|--------------------------------------------------- > UDF | 1.02,1.50 | NO | NO | NO | > Create| 2.01 | | | | > ------|--------------------------------------------------- > UDF | 1.02,1.50 | 1.01,1.50 | 1.01,1.50 | 1.01,1.50 | > Read | 2.01 | | | | Does this mean that you confirmed that FreeBSD was not able to mount a UDF 2.01 compliant disc? If so, can you let me know if an error was generated, and could you make an image of the disc avaialble for me to look at? Scott